The aim of this study was to examine the values and attitudes held by Australasian wildlife magers as they relate to wildlife magement issues, and to gain some insight into possible future directions and priorities for Australasian wildlife magement. During December 2002 - February 2003, 138 questionires were completed by members of the Australasian Wildlife Magement Society (AWMS) and registrants of the 2002 AWMS annual conference. Threatened species magement, threatened communities/habitats, and magement of introduced species were the issues rated as needing the highest priority for the Australasian Wildlife Magement Society. Issues such as animal rights, genetically modified organisms and timber harvesting on public lands were the lowest-rating issues. Respondents expressed a strong belief in maging and controlling wildlife to achieve wildlife magement objectives, a strong belief that wildlife should be protected and that wildlife magers should minimise the pain and suffering of individual animals, and a belief that resources should be directed towards conserving wildlife populations rather than protecting individual animals from non-threatened populations. While respondents held a strong belief that it is important to consult the community when developing wildlife magement policies and programs, there was little support for a comagerial approach where the community has a significant role to play in decision-making processes.
Unless otherwise indicated, works by Griffith University Scholars are © Griffith University. For further details please refer to the University Intellectual Property Policy.