A combition of animal welfare law and ture conservation law establishes a hierarchy of protection for wild animals, with rare, threatened or endangered tive animals receiving the highest levels of protection, plentiful tive animals lying in the middle - sometimes wellprotected, sometimes not - and introduced wild animals at the bottom. In reading beyond the accounts of contemporary law, especially in sociology and environmental history, a plausible argument can be made for the proposition that this prevailing general schema of protection refl ects an early 20th century assertion of a distinctive Australian identity, combined with the emergence of a conservation ethic and the decline of attempts to acclimatise British wild animals in Australia. Prior to federation the legal protection of wild animals was quite different, with tive animals receiving little protection until the late 19th century. Introduced wild animals were initially protected to allow their fl ourishing, but by the late 19th century were increasingly being characterised as 'pests' and their protection wound back. This article explores how and why attitudes to tive wild animals and introduced wild animals in Australia have changed over time, and how this continues to be refl ected in Australian law.
Unless otherwise indicated, works by Griffith University Scholars are © Griffith University. For further details please refer to the University Intellectual Property Policy.